Case.

Should legal cases be televised?

Should legal cases be televised? I think that this question has two answers to it. Yes and no. it really depends on the situation and whose in it. If it is a private matter then I think that it shouldn't be and if it is public and may affect the community then it should.

In the situation of a private matter I think that it should not be televised. The person doesn't not want others to know of his situation and how his life or family relations is. If people knew his case in the court it could destroy his job and his reputation among other people. It is also possible that his situation could've been a set up. Keeping it private wont let the public get the wrong vision of the person. If it is just a common person and like for say an employee of a small shop the case should be private.

If situations are public like a shooting or some kind of protest then I think that the cases should be televised. Televising these cases will generate public awareness and keep the community in guard of whatever is going to happen. One example of a public televised case would be of a congressmen having some kind of corrupt under table things. This should come to the light of the people to tell them that the law makers are not the right people to be sitting in congress. People will have their voice out and want change the way laws are made. More sincere law making will be made for the better of the people and not for the better of the politicians to keep their seats. Protesters should have their voice to be heard throughout a nation. The case of having better working conditions should be of public notice to tell the people that some people are being treated badly in their work place and that reform of the work place should happen to protect people.